On 05/13/2010 04:05 AM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
You assert that there is a policy violation where there is none, and
I've already explained how you can achieve a trivial resolution of the
behavior that bothers you with the existing packages.
In the Debian policy I see:
/var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems[59], so
the init.d scripts must handle this correctly.
"... _must_ handle ..."
And sudo doesn't handle this correctly. So it's policy violation.
Where I'm wrong?
MI'm not an expert in Debian policy. So if there is no policy violation
change severity, but don't close the bug, it exists!
--
sergio.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
