On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: >> Next steps: >> (1) Wait for testsuite results to finish completely. Verify nothing >> has regressed.
No regressions. >> (2) Remove changes to gcc package debian/rules2 and re-run validation. Some regressions caused by enabling cloog/ppl, however these regressions do not break the libstdc++6 package in any critical way. Re-running the test case by hand now works, and the C++ class has the correct offsets. >> (3) In parallel provide new patch to debian-glibc to fix alignment >> issues with pthread types. Done. >> (4) Ask debian-glibc team to run a build and look for testsuite regressions. Done. >> If the test results for (2) and (4) are clean, then I will give the >> green light for a new glibc to be uploaded. This will fix the >> libstdc++6 issues. The test results for (2) and (4) are clean enough for a release given my QA. > I guess there is a fifth step need: > (5) rebuild gcc-4.4 against the fixed glibc. Aurelian has uploaded a new glibc with the fix and informs me that gcc is currently rebuilding. Once I conform that the newly built gcc is OK, we can close this issue and start building packages again. Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
