On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 08:55:12PM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > > > > I confirm, it's what I see in the testsuite log: > > > > | 77 > > | __signbitl > > | version status: incompatible > > | GLIBCXX_3.4 > > | type: function > > | status: added > > If __signbitl is the only failure in the abi_check, then that's easy > to fix, the testsuite needs to be updated.
For the testsuite part yes, but not the segfault :( > With cloog/ppl disabled I still get 7 testsuite failures, so I'll have > to dig into each failure tommorow and see what's wrong. > > ~~~ > Running target unix > FAIL: abi_check > FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: 26_numerics/complex/13450.cc compilation failed to produce > executable > FAIL: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: 26_numerics/complex/pow.cc compilation failed to produce > executable > XPASS: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test > for excess errors) > FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/clear/1.c execution test > FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit.c execution test > FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/overloads_float.cc (test for excess > errors) > FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/overloads_int.cc (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/overloads_int.cc compilation > failed to produce executable > Does the resulting binary works correctly with apt-get? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
