(David, I'm cc-ing you on this since you commented on not receiving a
CC previously...if you want to receive updates on a particular bug,
directions on subscribing are at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#subscribe )

I don't know how your setup might have been working "before." If you
provide specifics on when it was working the way you expected, when it
stopped, and what you changed on your system in between, someone else
might be able to help figure it out. Unfortunately I'm not intimately
familiar with this package; I only installed it to see if I could
reproduce the problems you are having.

The steps I listed above got me to an apparently functional filtering
setup from a clean testing/squeeze system. You may want to try
removing dansguardian and tinyproxy and purging the configuration
files, then reinstalling them, just to get a clean slate. The
directions I was mostly following are here:
http://www.vollmar.ch/dansguardian-e.html ; you can also take a look
at http://www.pilpi.net/journal/item-985.php or
http://wiki.debian.org/HowTo/dansguardian (if you don't mind switching
to squid instead of tinyproxy.)

I've seen no indication that DansGuardian is intended to "intercept"
the traffic to the proxy or in any way work without having web traffic
sent through it, see for example http://dansguardian.org/?page=dgflow
. Port 80, not 8080, is the usual (non-proxied) web port, although
8080 is (rarely) used for some sites. If you're having some sites not
load, without any block messages, it would be useful to know the URLs
so others could verify.

The Google blocking may depend somewhat on what language Google is set
to. There are some hints on the DansGuardian site for customizing
blocklists, see http://dansguardian.org/?page=blacklist and
http://dansguardian.org/?page=extras

Best of luck getting a configuration that works for you.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to