On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 21:05, Hongzheng Wang <wan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Daobing, > > I'm sorry for disturbing you by raising the old bug report again. > > First of all, I would like to thank you for the contribution in > packaging both scim-python and ibus (and of course other packages). I > like ibus so much and hope this new input method framework can > successfully replace scim eventually given that the development of > scim in upstream has been stopped in fact. > > When I look at the solution provided by you in packaging ibus-pinyin, > I believe it is a really smart one to solve the ``having to download > database during building'' problem. Furthermore, I wonder if > scim-python-pinyin can be created following the same approach. After > all, ibus-pinyin and scim-python-pinyin use the same database in fact > (please correct me if I'm wrong). Well, I admit that scim-python has > been stopped in upstream. I think it might be better to have a more > complete ``workable'' scim-python because scim-python still exists in > Debian. > tegaki is in the debian ftp new, which is a handwriting input method and depends on scim-python. (which can make scim-python useful).
I don't want to package scim-python-pinyin, which is deprecated by upstream. -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
