Dear Daobing, I'm sorry for disturbing you by raising the old bug report again.
First of all, I would like to thank you for the contribution in packaging both scim-python and ibus (and of course other packages). I like ibus so much and hope this new input method framework can successfully replace scim eventually given that the development of scim in upstream has been stopped in fact. When I look at the solution provided by you in packaging ibus-pinyin, I believe it is a really smart one to solve the ``having to download database during building'' problem. Furthermore, I wonder if scim-python-pinyin can be created following the same approach. After all, ibus-pinyin and scim-python-pinyin use the same database in fact (please correct me if I'm wrong). Well, I admit that scim-python has been stopped in upstream. I think it might be better to have a more complete ``workable'' scim-python because scim-python still exists in Debian. Thank you in advance. -- HZ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
