On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:34:52AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:05PM +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > have you marked the bug as being closed by your upload (ie adding a > > > "Closes: #520445" in debian/changelog). Since the bug is shared by the > > > 2 > > > packages, this should fix the situation. > > > cheers, > > > > Seems so: > > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/speech-tools/news/20090328T153211Z.html > > > > In fact, the graph generated in the BTS also shows this aspect, which > > led me to the confusion. > > Normally it should be OK when one of the two packages closes the bug. > That is the sematics of assigning a bug to two packages. However, > I am not sure whether that feature of the BTS is used a lot so I > wouldn't exclude completely that there is a bug. Please observe > what is going on with the packages, if they continue to be blocked > from testing migration please talk to the release team.
Thanks for the clarification, Ralf. I'll get in touch with the release team after the 10 day waiting period. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
