Your message dated Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:34:36 -0700
with message-id <20090321193436.ga20...@dario.dodds.net>
and subject line Re: feedback on #516997 missing
has caused the Debian Bug report #516997,
regarding python-imaging: License not compatible with DFSG
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
516997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516997
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-imaging
Version: 1.1.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

Per requesting input on the license for python-imaging onto
debial-legal
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/02/msg00057.html), 
in which an resonse was made that the license is not DFSG compilant.
Thus I notify you here about the issue and ask you, if possible, to
resolve the issue.

The suggestion made is to try getting the software relicensed under an
compatible license, e.g. for example /usr/share/doc/x11-apps/copyright.

/Carl Fürstenberg


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages python-imaging depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.7-18            GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfreetype6           2.3.7-2           FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libjpeg62              6b-14             The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  mime-support           3.44-1            MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  python                 2.5.2-3           An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central         0.6.8             register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-imaging-tk      1.1.6-3           Python Imaging Library - ImageTk M
ii  zlib1g                 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime

python-imaging recommends no packages.

Versions of packages python-imaging suggests:
pn  python-imaging-dbg            <none>     (no description available)
pn  python-imaging-doc            <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:16:43PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The bug submitter of #516997 apparently did ask for help on debian-legal
> before submitting this report, but didn't give any feedback on the
> upstream response.  Please could the people involved with this followup on
> this report?

Looking back at the thread, I see that I was insufficiently verbose in my
reply.

   http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2009/02/msg00069.html

When I said "no" as in "no, I don't see the ambiguity", I failed to clarify
that I meant there is no ambiguity because the wording is unambiguously free
to anyone familiar with ordinary legal language - not that it's
unambiguously non-free, as Ben Finney seems to maintain.  Greg Harris has it
right, and Ben Finney as usual is coming up with absurd constructivist
non-free readings of licenses.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to