On 15/10/08 at 04:16 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> Working with lucas, I've successfully been able to build ruby1.9. The
> issue is related to NPTL support in the kernel. NPTL on HPPA is
> extremely unstable it seems, and currently causes anything that uses
> to threads to go boom under some cirmstances. Some versions of the
> kernel however appear to work. I had a successful build with a machine
> with the following uname
> 
> Linux gsyprf11 2.6.22.19 #1 SMP Sat Apr 5 18:55:33 PDT 2008 parisc64 GNU/Linux
> 
> The test suite passes successfully, although it does take an extremely
> long time to build. cpuinfo is as follows:
> 
> processor     : 0
> cpu family    : PA-RISC 2.0
> cpu           : PA8700 (PCX-W2)
> cpu MHz               : 750.000000
> model         : 9000/800/A500-7X
> model name    : Crescendo 750 W2
> hversion      : 0x00005e30
> sversion      : 0x00000491
> I-cache               : 768 KB
> D-cache               : 1536 KB (WB, direct mapped)
> ITLB entries  : 240
> DTLB entries  : 240 - shared with ITLB
> bogomips      : 1495.04
> software id   : 824930630
> 
> processor     : 1
> cpu family    : PA-RISC 2.0
> cpu           : PA8700 (PCX-W2)
> cpu MHz               : 750.000000
> model         : 9000/800/A500-7X
> model name    : Crescendo 750 W2
> hversion      : 0x00005e30
> sversion      : 0x00000491
> I-cache               : 768 KB
> D-cache               : 1536 KB (WB, direct mapped)
> ITLB entries  : 240
> DTLB entries  : 240 - shared with ITLB
> bogomips      : 1495.04
> software id   : 824930630
> 
> I uploaded the results to ~ncommander-guest/ruby1.9 on alioth. The
> 219kb build.log is available. Built with debuild -B -b
> Michael

Following Michael's steps, I successfully built ruby1.9 on mkhppa3, one
of Thibaut Varene's boxes, using the following kernel:
Linux mkhppa3 2.6.22.19 #1 SMP Tue Oct 14 14:22:05 CEST 2008 parisc64
GNU/Linux

Before that, I tried to build using lenny's 2.6.26. I ran into several
WARN_ON()s and hard locks, and never managed to build ruby1.9 on hppa
using lenny's kernel. This kernel is clearly not ready for a release,
but it's not my call to make...

After the build, ruby's test suite mostly passed (some thread tests just
blocked, so there's still a problem with threading on hppa). So I had to
disable it in debian/rules. I think that the status is "good enough" for
lenny/hppa. And this should allow to build the other missing packages
too.

Dato, is it fine if I upload those binaries to unstable? How should I
proceed to make them migrate to testing? I think they will magically
appear in testing since the source is already in testing, but I'm not
sure now.

Thanks a lot to Michael for hinting about 2.6.22.19 :-)
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to