It should be noted that in my run, the test suite completed with only two failures. Michael
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15/10/08 at 04:16 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: >> Working with lucas, I've successfully been able to build ruby1.9. The >> issue is related to NPTL support in the kernel. NPTL on HPPA is >> extremely unstable it seems, and currently causes anything that uses >> to threads to go boom under some cirmstances. Some versions of the >> kernel however appear to work. I had a successful build with a machine >> with the following uname >> >> Linux gsyprf11 2.6.22.19 #1 SMP Sat Apr 5 18:55:33 PDT 2008 parisc64 >> GNU/Linux >> >> The test suite passes successfully, although it does take an extremely >> long time to build. cpuinfo is as follows: >> >> processor : 0 >> cpu family : PA-RISC 2.0 >> cpu : PA8700 (PCX-W2) >> cpu MHz : 750.000000 >> model : 9000/800/A500-7X >> model name : Crescendo 750 W2 >> hversion : 0x00005e30 >> sversion : 0x00000491 >> I-cache : 768 KB >> D-cache : 1536 KB (WB, direct mapped) >> ITLB entries : 240 >> DTLB entries : 240 - shared with ITLB >> bogomips : 1495.04 >> software id : 824930630 >> >> processor : 1 >> cpu family : PA-RISC 2.0 >> cpu : PA8700 (PCX-W2) >> cpu MHz : 750.000000 >> model : 9000/800/A500-7X >> model name : Crescendo 750 W2 >> hversion : 0x00005e30 >> sversion : 0x00000491 >> I-cache : 768 KB >> D-cache : 1536 KB (WB, direct mapped) >> ITLB entries : 240 >> DTLB entries : 240 - shared with ITLB >> bogomips : 1495.04 >> software id : 824930630 >> >> I uploaded the results to ~ncommander-guest/ruby1.9 on alioth. The >> 219kb build.log is available. Built with debuild -B -b >> Michael > > Following Michael's steps, I successfully built ruby1.9 on mkhppa3, one > of Thibaut Varene's boxes, using the following kernel: > Linux mkhppa3 2.6.22.19 #1 SMP Tue Oct 14 14:22:05 CEST 2008 parisc64 > GNU/Linux > > Before that, I tried to build using lenny's 2.6.26. I ran into several > WARN_ON()s and hard locks, and never managed to build ruby1.9 on hppa > using lenny's kernel. This kernel is clearly not ready for a release, > but it's not my call to make... > > After the build, ruby's test suite mostly passed (some thread tests just > blocked, so there's still a problem with threading on hppa). So I had to > disable it in debian/rules. I think that the status is "good enough" for > lenny/hppa. And this should allow to build the other missing packages > too. > > Dato, is it fine if I upload those binaries to unstable? How should I > proceed to make them migrate to testing? I think they will magically > appear in testing since the source is already in testing, but I'm not > sure now. > > Thanks a lot to Michael for hinting about 2.6.22.19 :-) > -- > | Lucas Nussbaum > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | > | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
