Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Luk Claes dixit: > >> Why did you restrict the build dependency on dietlibc to a whole list of >> architectures? > > This is the list of architectures dietlibc exists on (taken from its > debian/control file, copied verbatim).
ok > On architectures without dietlibc, mksh-static is statically linked > against glibc (in mksh-35.2-1 it was dynamically linked, since I forgot > to add -static which the “diet” helper does by itself). > >> Is the build dependency on locales-all really needed, if so in what way? > > Yes, one of the regression tests sets the locale to “en_US.UTF-8” and > checks if mksh (non-static) switches to Unicode mode automatically then. ok unblocked -2 > Thanks for your attention ☺ I’m trying to get it as bug- and warning-free > as possible, and more peoples’ eyes are helping with that. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
