Luk Claes dixit: >Why did you restrict the build dependency on dietlibc to a whole list of >architectures?
This is the list of architectures dietlibc exists on (taken from its debian/control file, copied verbatim). On architectures without dietlibc, mksh-static is statically linked against glibc (in mksh-35.2-1 it was dynamically linked, since I forgot to add -static which the “diet” helper does by itself). >Is the build dependency on locales-all really needed, if so in what way? Yes, one of the regression tests sets the locale to “en_US.UTF-8” and checks if mksh (non-static) switches to Unicode mode automatically then. Thanks for your attention ☺ I’m trying to get it as bug- and warning-free as possible, and more peoples’ eyes are helping with that. bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
