On 2008-04-07 10:26 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:

> The reason for this is, that some of the "useless cruft", as you call it,
> is used by very important scripts in the devscripts collection.

Is this really true for _all_ the recommendations?  The long package
description does not mention why devscripts-el is recommended, and that
package has its own quite massive *dependencies*.  And what about
lsb-release?  Why do you want that?

> About the server recommendation: Thats a bug. Its already fixed in the
> current trunk of devscripts.

Okay, thanks.

Regards,
        Sven



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to