On 2008-04-07 10:26 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > The reason for this is, that some of the "useless cruft", as you call it, > is used by very important scripts in the devscripts collection.
Is this really true for _all_ the recommendations? The long package description does not mention why devscripts-el is recommended, and that package has its own quite massive *dependencies*. And what about lsb-release? Why do you want that? > About the server recommendation: Thats a bug. Its already fixed in the > current trunk of devscripts. Okay, thanks. Regards, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]