On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:59:43PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > which is serious, since there needs to happen, at least, one more 2.6.24 > upload of l-m-e-2.6 before 2.6.25 in order to get 2.6.24 into testing.
Oh come on Daniel, l-m-e-2.6 never build amd64 packages for virtualbox-ose so far. So how can this suddenly be a reason for marking the bug serious? > can be easily solved by reverting that 2.6.25 patch someone recently added. Instead of pointing fingers you should do your due dilligence. Being member of a development group means more than just removing blanks. How about giving the world an l-m-e-2.6 version that actually tries to build amd64 packages? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
