Am Montag, den 17.12.2007, 17:53 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV: > That already happens via alternatives slaves. As discussed earlier, > it's inappropriate with ABI-incompatible soname-named files e.g. *.so.0 > > I think we're going in the right direction: alternatives for *.so and > different filenames in /usr/lib for *.so.0 , right?
Yes, that's the way to go, I think. These are not that trivial to change in openmpi but I'm working on that. Debhelper stuff needs to be adjusted, so it shouldn't that hard to do in theory; one just has to watch out for what goes where. > The only way we could do better is to use the same names for our fortran > and C++ library .so alternatives. But I don't think it's worth it: I > don't think they're even sufficiently API-compatible. I think so too. We keep the original names and handle libmpi.so via u-a. This seems to be the only intersecting library. Viele Grüße Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
