On 17 December 2007 at 18:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
| Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| > reassign 456721 libopenmpi1
| Bug#456721: libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries
| Bug reassigned from package `libpetsc2.3.3' to `libopenmpi1'.
|
| > severity 456721 grave
| Bug#456721: libpetsc.so depends on unexistent libraries
| Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
|
| > thanks
| Stopping processing here.
Indeed, what were we thinking here Manuel?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dpkg -c
/var/cache/pbuilder/result/libopenmpi1_1.2.4-4_i386.deb | tail -7
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libopen-pal.so.0 -> libopen-pal.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.0 -> libmpi.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi_f77.so.0 -> libmpi_f77.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.0 -> libmpi_cxx.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi_f90.so.0 -> libmpi_f90.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libopen-rte.so.0 -> libopen-rte.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmca_common_sm.so.0 -> libmca_common_sm.so.0.0.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
In light of this, can you remind me why you put the libs into
/usr/lib/openmpi ? I understand why we put the _internal_ library files like
-rw-r--r-- root/root 65620 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/openmpi/mca_oob_tcp.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root 25084 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/openmpi/mca_btl_sm.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root 65244 2007-12-12 13:13
./usr/lib/openmpi/lib/openmpi/mca_pml_ob1.so
[...]
there, but for the visible libraries were are introducing breakage by hiding
them. I am leaning towards pulling them back. Am I overlooking something?
Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
