On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thanks for the report.
> However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources
> (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot)
> on bruckner, with "CFLAGS=-g ./configure && make", and it passes
> that same test:
> 
>     bruckner$ ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95
>     10.8
>     10.9
> 
> I also recompiled seq.o with CFLAGS=-O2.  Same result.
> 
> Can you try the same thing on whatever system you used?

I pulled the latest sources from git and built them with CFLAGS=-g, like
you said, giving again the same erroneous results:

    [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95
    10.8
    10.9
    11.0

Recompiling seq by hand with -O2 gives the same faulty result as
compiling with -g gives for me.  So there seems to be some kind of
difference between bruckner and my machine...  I don't understand this.
Any hints or pointers?

Cheers,
Bram



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to