Bram Senders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Thanks for the report. >> However, I've just built from the very latest upstream sources >> (but probably no change to seq since the 20070907 snapshot) >> on bruckner, with "CFLAGS=-g ./configure && make", and it passes >> that same test: >> >> bruckner$ ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 >> 10.8 >> 10.9 >> >> I also recompiled seq.o with CFLAGS=-O2. Same result. >> >> Can you try the same thing on whatever system you used? > > I pulled the latest sources from git and built them with CFLAGS=-g, like > you said, giving again the same erroneous results: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./seq 10.8 0.1 10.95 > 10.8 > 10.9 > 11.0 > > Recompiling seq by hand with -O2 gives the same faulty result as > compiling with -g gives for me. So there seems to be some kind of > difference between bruckner and my machine... I don't understand this. > Any hints or pointers?
gcc version? Maybe libc bruckner has this: gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13) libc6: Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge6 Please send me your lib/config.h file so I can compare it with mine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
