Your message dated Mon, 02 May 2005 04:32:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307171: fixed in tela 2.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 11:44:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 04:44:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203005.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DSCsL-00066s-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 04:44:42 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DSCsY-0007Es-Ie; Sun, 01 May 2005 13:44:54 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tela: FTBFS (sarge): "Blas not found!"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 13:44:54 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tela
Version: 2.0-8
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

When building 'tela' in a clean chroot on i386/testing,
I get the following error:

checking for completion_matches in -lreadline... yes
checking for ddot in -lblas2... no
configure: error: "Blas not found!"
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1

The newer version 2.0-9 from sid, which is 122 days old and
apparently waits for a build on arm, fixes this.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307171-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 08:46:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 02 01:46:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DSWZv-0004HI-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 01:46:59 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DSWLg-0004Km-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 04:32:16 -0400
From: Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307171: fixed in tela 2.0-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 04:32:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: tela
Source-Version: 2.0-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tela, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tela_2.0-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tela/tela_2.0-10.diff.gz
tela_2.0-10.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tela/tela_2.0-10.dsc
tela_2.0-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tela/tela_2.0-10_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tela package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  2 May 2005 10:02:11 +0200
Source: tela
Binary: tela
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 tela       - interactive tensor language
Closes: 307171 307244
Changes: 
 tela (2.0-10) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Change b-d to not use atlas3, as it's not available on arm for now,
     and the build will work with blas/lapack as well.
     (Closes: #307171, #307244).
Files: 
 cad703b5b6d5139dfb0d9813031e618d 650 math optional tela_2.0-10.dsc
 d82d8f66d4a8b0e06c73914a561f0181 61515 math optional tela_2.0-10.diff.gz
 a7e779d1b95a183fbfb5d8d9f4ed8a63 2686048 math optional tela_2.0-10_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCdeFAV5Mp08AbKiIRAhBIAJ4uA3j8I2KIzOXwskFAA2BYjFZbpACfXfRr
lgH3Se1MPxqlBXc0vkAJ4Pg=
=0xD5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to