Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 16:31:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed version in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 11:44:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 04:44:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c203005.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DSCsL-00066s-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 04:44:42 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DSCsY-0007Es-Ie; Sun, 01 May 2005 13:44:54 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tela: FTBFS (sarge): "Blas not found!"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 13:44:54 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tela
Version: 2.0-8
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
When building 'tela' in a clean chroot on i386/testing,
I get the following error:
checking for completion_matches in -lreadline... yes
checking for ddot in -lblas2... no
configure: error: "Blas not found!"
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
The newer version 2.0-9 from sid, which is 122 days old and
apparently waits for a build on arm, fixes this.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307171-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 14:31:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 07:31:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DU3rD-0006LL-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 07:31:11 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DU3rB-00016i-Ou
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 May 2005 16:31:09 +0200
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:31:09 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed version in sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
2.0-10 has reached testing
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
