Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 18:21:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 10:21:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.4.8]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEWxR-0007dP-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:21:25 -0800
Received: from gate.22.kls.lan (vpn4.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.172.4])
by piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2OILMQX028656
for finalrecipients; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.22.1])
by gate.22.kls.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2OILM0q015193
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100
Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2OILMoM004111
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j2OILMdk004109
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:21:22 +0100
From: Mario Holbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
the new 2.11-1 dosfsck shows lots of errors on my filesystems (FAT32,
LFN / VFAT), while the filesystem looks quite okay and neither Windows
scandisk nor 2.10-1 dosfsck show any errors.
The errors reported are (perhaps among others):
* Start cluster beyond limit (...). Truncating file.
* File size is ... bytes, cluster chain length is 0 bytes.
Truncating file to 0 bytes.
* Free cluster summary wrong (... vs. really ...)
* Start does point to root directory. Deleting dir.
As you can see in other bug reports, users seem to stumble over it
already. Therefore, I consider this bug grave enough to prevent
2.11-1 from migration into testing, thus I raised the serverity
appropriately.
Thanks for your work & regards
Mario
--
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who
understand binary, and those who don't...
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300126-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 12:24:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 05:24:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI49Y-0005fc-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:24:32 -0700
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI49Y-0003Kv-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:24:32 -0600
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI42J-0004lT-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300126: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the toplevel Makefile had no effect; added
$(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
#300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
Closes: #300126, #301254.
* #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
995f3cc08408dbe7d2ee2d37e5f8d3f5 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
5b807e616f4191945b63d602e3513768 8347 otherosfs optional
dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
5add46c0f2b78d45bfa55e81acc89de1 53266 otherosfs optional
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3JWD3FdvcRAu2pAJ9xrYDrheNl5BvuCeTCNNJ9+39zIACfQC4Q
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+qQwghpNxQ=
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
