Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302517: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 07:47:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 23:47:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHGso-0006ix-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:47:58 -0800
Received: from mnisek.casablanca.cz (orion.lan) [217.11.255.138]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHGsn-0008Ut-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 01:47:57 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:47:50 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge patch
Justification: causes serious data loss
cause: dosfsck does not recognize deleted files as deleted.
this can occur on filesystems that are NOT corrupt
if allowed to fix the filesystem (such as from the boot script)
causes DATA LOSS
Probably the same as closed #294177.
But the problem is not amd64 specific, it is triggered by current toolchain.
i386 binary package from Sep 2003 is not affected,
but after rebuild (i.e. by security team, by end user) will be.
Patch (already included in 2.11-1):
--- dosfsck.h~ 2005-04-01 09:33:50.000000000 +0200
+++ dosfsck.h 2005-04-01 09:33:50.000000000 +0200
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
};
typedef struct {
- __s8 name[8],ext[3]; /* name and extension */
+ __u8 name[8],ext[3]; /* name and extension */
__u8 attr; /* attribute bits */
__u8 lcase; /* Case for base and extension */
__u8 ctime_ms; /* Creation time, milliseconds */
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-orion
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2)
Versions of packages dosfstools depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302517-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 12:24:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 05:24:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI49Z-0005fo-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 05:24:33 -0700
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI49Y-0003L7-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:24:32 -0600
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI42J-0004lX-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
From: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#302517: fixed in dosfstools 2.11-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:17:03 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: dosfstools
Source-Version: 2.11-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dosfstools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dosfstools/dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dosfstools package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 13:56:55 +0200
Source: dosfstools
Binary: dosfstools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Roman Hodek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dosfstools - Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems
Closes: 300126 301254 302517
Changes:
dosfstools (2.11-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Oops, debian/rules overrides OPTFLAGS and therefore the
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the toplevel Makefile had no effect; added
$(shell getconf LFS_CFLAGS) to OPTFLAGS as suggested by Lars Wirzenius in
#300126. Sorry, I tested a version compiled by the upstream Makefile...
Closes: #300126, #301254.
* #302517 was indeed the same as #294177, and fix is the same (use __u8) as
in 2.11-1. Closes: #302517.
Files:
995f3cc08408dbe7d2ee2d37e5f8d3f5 554 otherosfs optional dosfstools_2.11-2.dsc
5b807e616f4191945b63d602e3513768 8347 otherosfs optional
dosfstools_2.11-2.diff.gz
5add46c0f2b78d45bfa55e81acc89de1 53266 otherosfs optional
dosfstools_2.11-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCT9rjcS3JWD3FdvcRAu2pAJ9xrYDrheNl5BvuCeTCNNJ9+39zIACfQC4Q
V1r5VGIdgZ4hi+qQwghpNxQ=
=tA6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
