Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:13:15 +1030
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294960: wacom-tools_0.6.6-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing
build-depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 17:53:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 09:53:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D01Sc-00086A-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:53:38 -0800
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A039C16EDF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:53:35 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 83FB88F2D9; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:53:35 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:53:35 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wacom-tools_0.6.6-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wacom-tools
Version: 0.6.6-6
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of wacom-tools_0.6.6-6 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050212-1345
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), po-debconf, libxt-dev, libncurses5-dev
[...]
> In file included from ../../src/wacomcfg.c:26:
> ../../src/wacomcfg.h:25:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from ../../src/wacomcfg.c:26:
> ../../src/wacomcfg.h:55: error: syntax error before '*' token
> ../../src/wacomcfg.c:44:22: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
> ../../src/wacomcfg.c:45:35: X11/extensions/XInput.h: No such file or directory
> ../../src/wacomcfg.c:46:36: X11/extensions/XIproto.h: No such file or
> directory
A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=wacom-tools&ver=0.6.6-6
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294960-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2005 01:43:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 17:43:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp242-51.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz)
[203.122.242.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1ahW-00077g-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:43:31 -0800
Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D1ahH-0006sa-Nn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:13:15 +1030
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:13:15 +1030
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#294960: wacom-tools_0.6.6-6(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing
build-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Thanks Adam, I'll close this one now in that case, on the assumption
that either the porters will do a manual push to fix these, or I'll
have a new package to upload to trigger that before long anyway.
best,
Ron
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 05:18:26PM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote:
> This is not a bug in this package, but rather a bug in xfree86-common.
> See #295175.
>
> lamont: If you have more of these mysterious "X headers can't be found,
> even though they should be there" bugs, pre-seed your chroots with
> xfree86-common, make sure it's in state "ii", and retry the builds.
>
> ... Adam
>
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
