Hi, Now, I saw this mail!! Thank you for your reply.
Currently, I don't use scim-bridge-el. I also upload if my necessary. 2012/2/19 Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org>: > retitle 642371 RM: scim-bridge -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, unfit > for KDE4/QT4 > retitle 642560 RM: scim-bridge-el -- RoQA; removal of dependency, no response > from maintainer > reassign 642371 ftp.debian.org > severity 642371 normal > reassign 642560 ftp.debian.org > quit > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:25:41 +0800 > Aron Xu <happyaron...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The question in subject line should be revisited now. I'm not sure >> about what's your opinions now, as there still isn't any activity to >> implement Osamu's proposal (and a QA upload underway). > > There's no need to pursue this through another round of non-responses. > > There have been no changes since : > Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:20:19 +0000 > >> Unless someone intends to look after the existing software and maintain >> it within Debian then the answer will be yes - remove it. Either fix it >> or let it be removed due to inaction. Simple. >> >> Unmaintained software which is dead upstream and has not been ported to >> updated libraries in Debian is always a candidate for removal. >> >> Those who care about this software need to step up and do the work. >> That's all there is to it. It's not enough to just protest or complain - >> unless someone does the work, the package remains a candidate for >> removal. The RC bugs mentioned originally don't seem to be open any >> longer, so there is time for the work to be done. >> >> If the work isn't done, I'll reassign the removal bug myself. > > So reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org for removal of scim-bridge. > > Nobody has stepped up to do the work in the previous month, so there > can be no complaints about the removal. > > Also seeking the removal of scim-bridge-el as there has been no > response to #642560 re the removal of scim-bridge since Sat, 24 Sep > 2011. > > If someone wants eventually does the work, the package can be > re-introduced but it's been 5 months since the original bug report, so > that seems unlikely. > > -- > > > Neil Williams > ============= > http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ > -- Takaya Yamashita yamash...@takaya.biz tak...@debian.or.jp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
