On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:30:58PM +0100, Philip Paeps wrote: > >The main difference seems to be in the way the web of trust statistics >are presented. In the FOSDEM files, we put them below the output from >gpg. The Debian format puts a "rank" next to the name.
I would like to suggest to file those diffs as bug reports for the signing-party package so they get merged in the package. >Since as you point out everyone is already using caff to do their >signing homework, it's probably not much work to convince everyone >organizing keysigning parties to use caff (or the tools distributed >with caff) to create their lists of participants. I agree. >I have no strong views on what the list should look like. But I do >think that the best place for the "canonical list format" is likely >the caff distribution. I agree. In future, I'll use whatever script is in signing-party to create the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
