On 15 Feb 2012, at 20:08, Luca Capello wrote: > First question: why so many different outputs? AFAIK gpgparticipants
> has been shipped starting with signing-party_1.0-1 and it has never been > modified since then (but we need, see below). I went through the gpg > manpage and there is no sign of a similar option. The main difference seems to be in the way the web of trust statistics are presented. In the FOSDEM files, we put them below the output from gpg. The Debian format puts a "rank" next to the name. Another difference is that the German files are localized. I haven't read through the whole history of this bug but ... would it not make sense to distribute the organizing voodoo with caff? Then organizers could just "configure caff" for their keysigning parties. Since as you point out everyone is already using caff to do their signing homework, it's probably not much work to convince everyone organizing keysigning parties to use caff (or the tools distributed with caff) to create their lists of participants. All the voodoo I use for the FOSDEM keysigning party is available on github at <https://github.com/ppaeps/fosdem-keysigning>. Feel free to take that as a starting point. Or not. :) I have no strong views on what the list should look like. But I do think that the best place for the "canonical list format" is likely the caff distribution. - Philip -- Philip Paeps Senior Reality Engineer Ministry of Information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
