Totally makes sense. I think we'll replace LOCAL_CONF_FILE with the
conf.d/ implementation.
cheers,
Arno
On 03-Feb-12 11:23, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Arno van Amersfoort wrote:
Fixing this before April, shouldn't be a problem. Only thing I'm
wondering about: Can't you use LOCAL_CONFIG_FILE (I don't think
version 1.9.x already has this) to do/implement what you want or is
it too restricted?
LOCAL_CONFIG_FILE points to a single file. The idea of a config.d/
directory is that other packages can drop config snippets in there and
alter the configuration. Separate config snippet files having the
advantage that packages wouldn't conflict with each other and an admin
can still alter any package-provided configuration with yet another
snippet that is loaded at the end.
michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
