On 02/02/2012 04:33 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Matijs van Zuijlen escreveu isso aí:
On 02/01/2012 12:20 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Matijs van Zuijlen escreveu isso aí:
That sounds like a very good plan. I have one thing I would like to
change, which is that it would set GEM_HOME to ~/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems,
to match what plain rubygems would do when given the option
--user-install.
Not sure about that. If we use the same directory as --user-install
would, you risk having two different interpreters installing gems to the
same place. I think it's better to keep each interpreter with its
isolated gem environment.
I'm not sure I see how that risk would happen. It would be only the
two system Rubies that install to ~/.gem/ruby/<version>/gems.
If you pass --user-install to gem under any Ruby 1.9, they will all
install to the same place.
I see what you mean. Sounds like a dangerous option in any case.
All in all, if you choose to use rbenv, you should not need to care
where the gems are installed, as long as their programs are in your path
and you can require their libraries.
True, but it would be nice if the system rubies could use the same
gems, whether or not they're being run through rbenv. I would like
to avoid having more copies of gems installed than necessary.
You can symlink ~/.gem/ruby/$version to the corresponding gems directory
inside ~/.rbenv/
That's a good tip, thanks. And thanks for fixing this bug.
Regards,
--
Matijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
