Matijs van Zuijlen escreveu isso aí: > On 02/01/2012 12:20 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >Matijs van Zuijlen escreveu isso aí: > >>That sounds like a very good plan. I have one thing I would like to > >>change, which is that it would set GEM_HOME to ~/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems, > >>to match what plain rubygems would do when given the option > >>--user-install. > > > >Not sure about that. If we use the same directory as --user-install > >would, you risk having two different interpreters installing gems to the > >same place. I think it's better to keep each interpreter with its > >isolated gem environment. > > I'm not sure I see how that risk would happen. It would be only the > two system Rubies that install to ~/.gem/ruby/<version>/gems.
If you pass --user-install to gem under any Ruby 1.9, they will all install to the same place. > >All in all, if you choose to use rbenv, you should not need to care > >where the gems are installed, as long as their programs are in your path > >and you can require their libraries. > > True, but it would be nice if the system rubies could use the same > gems, whether or not they're being run through rbenv. I would like > to avoid having more copies of gems installed than necessary. You can symlink ~/.gem/ruby/$version to the corresponding gems directory inside ~/.rbenv/ -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
