tags 655726 +wontfix thanks they shouldn't since they both could be configured to guard different services / ports, thus I don't see any strict conflict. Use of both of them might be discouraged though indeed.
agreed? On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Jerome Warnier wrote: > Package: fail2ban > Version: 0.8.4-3 > Severity: wishlist > Currently, fail2ban and denyhosts packages do not conflict, which may lead to > strange results. > As they share the same goal and technologies (even if fail2ban is way more > advanced), I really think they should conflict. -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
