Package: fail2ban Version: 0.8.4-3 Severity: wishlist Currently, fail2ban and denyhosts packages do not conflict, which may lead to strange results. As they share the same goal and technologies (even if fail2ban is way more advanced), I really think they should conflict.
-- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages fail2ban depends on: ii lsb-base 3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-central 0.6.16+nmu1 register and build utility for Pyt Versions of packages fail2ban recommends: ii iptables 1.4.8-3 administration tools for packet fi ii whois 5.0.10 an intelligent whois client Versions of packages fail2ban suggests: ii bsd-mailx [mailx] 8.1.2-0.20100314cvs-1 simple mail user agent ii mailutils [mailx] 1:2.1+dfsg1-7 GNU mailutils utilities for handli ii python-gamin 0.1.10-2+b1 Python binding for the gamin clien -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
