Hi Adam, On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 20:33, Adam C Powell IV <hazel...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Muammar, > > Reducing the recipients list as this concerns technical details. > > On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 20:31 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: >> Source: scalapack >> Followup-For: Bug #652313 >> >> Hi, >> >> I have prepared a new revision of scalapack, but I have a doubt which is: do >> I have to provide a new binary package (e.g. libscalapack-mpich2)? > > Terrific! I don't think you need a binary package, the existing > libscalapack-mpi1 and -mpi-dev packages with libscalapack-mpich2*.[so|a] > files should be fine. >
I see. So, I'll do that. I'll provide the new compiled libraries compiled against mpich2 into the libscalapack-mpi1 package. Thanks for answering. >> As for blacs-mpi, it has been rebuilt successfully.¹ > > Indeed, thanks! > :) >> I'll be waiting attentive for your replies, and thus proceed correctly with >> your >> advises. > > Thanks, I'll look for the upload and check the buildd logs, and upload > mumps when scalapack finishes. > >> PS. Adam, thanks for the patch. > > No problem, hope it was useful! > Regards, -- Muammar El Khatib. Linux user: 403107. GPG Key = 127029F1 http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org ,''`. : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
