Hi Muammar, Reducing the recipients list as this concerns technical details.
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 20:31 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > Source: scalapack > Followup-For: Bug #652313 > > Hi, > > I have prepared a new revision of scalapack, but I have a doubt which is: do > I have to provide a new binary package (e.g. libscalapack-mpich2)? Terrific! I don't think you need a binary package, the existing libscalapack-mpi1 and -mpi-dev packages with libscalapack-mpich2*.[so|a] files should be fine. > As for blacs-mpi, it has been rebuilt successfully.ยน Indeed, thanks! > I'll be waiting attentive for your replies, and thus proceed correctly with > your > advises. Thanks, I'll look for the upload and check the buildd logs, and upload mumps when scalapack finishes. > PS. Adam, thanks for the patch. No problem, hope it was useful! -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
