Hi, On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Martin Ueding wrote: > > ruby-rdiscount was designed to be distributed by ruby gems as far as I > > understand the upstream project page. Therefore, I assume that this > > would have to be fixed in Debian since we use our own packaging system. > > > > I do not know Ruby, so I cannot supply a patch which splits off the > > discount and uses the Debian version instead.
> I'm not into Ruby either, maybe someone from the pkg-ruby-extras team may
> provide some help?
It is possible to build ruby-rdiscount against libmarkdown2-dev, by
deleting the convenience copy of discount from the package (everything
in ext/ except config.h, extconf.rb and rdiscount.c) and add the
following line in extconf.rb with a patch:
have_library('markdown')
However, rdiscount seems to expect a different version of
discount/libmarkdown2,
because two of the tests fail. I get the following error, which
is certainly due to a change in conventions in discount (dot instead of
+) :
---------
Failure:
test_should_get_the_generated_toc(RDiscountTest)
[./test/rdiscount_test.rb:57]:
<"<ul>\n <li><a href=\"#Level+1\">Level 1</a>\n <ul>\n <li><a
href=\"#Level+2\">Level 2</a> </li>\n </ul>\n </li>\n </ul>"> expected
but was
<"<ul>\n <li><a href=\"#Level.1\">Level 1</a></li>\n <li><ul>\n <li><a
href=\"#Level.2\">Level 2</a></li>\n </ul></li>\n</ul>">.
diff:
<ul>
- <li><a href="#Level+1">Level 1</a>
? ^
+ <li><a href="#Level.1">Level 1</a></li>
? ^ +++++
- <ul>
+ <li><ul>
- <li><a href="#Level+2">Level 2</a> </li>
? ^ --
+ <li><a href="#Level.2">Level 2</a></li>
? ^
+ </ul></li>
- </ul>
- </li>
- </ul>
? -
+ </ul>
..F
Failure:
test_that_generate_toc_sets_toc_ids(RDiscountTest)
[./test/rdiscount_test.rb:51]:
<"<h1 id=\"Level+1\">Level 1</h1>\n\n<h2 id=\"Level+2\">Level
2</h2>\n"> expected but was
<"<h1 id=\"Level.1\">Level 1</h1>\n\n<h2 id=\"Level.2\">Level
2</h2>\n">.
diff:
- <h1 id="Level+1">Level 1</h1>
? ^
+ <h1 id="Level.1">Level 1</h1>
? ^
- <h2 id="Level+2">Level 2</h2>
? ^
+ <h2 id="Level.2">Level 2</h2>
? ^
-----
One could patch the tests and document it in a Readme.Debian, but I am
not sure that it is the correct thing to do. Probably this has to be
reported upstream, so that they release a new version compatible with
the newest version of discount.
Best regards,
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
