Le mercredi 23 novembre 2011 à 14:06 +0000, Justin B Rye a écrit : > > There are two sentences regarding the content and I don't see how they fit > > together. And I don't understand the difference between icons and symbolic > > icons. Icons are symbols and thus they are symbolic. Did I miss something? > > Maybe it's talking about "symbolic icons" in this sense: > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/SymbolicIcons
Yes. Also, they are more intended for use on a dark background. For example: Normal: Symbolic: > ...though reading that doesn't makes it much clearer to me what the > term is intended to convey. *All* desktop icons are necessarily 100% > symbolic, in that they represent things, so what could it possibly > mean to single out a particular set of icons as the symbolic ones? > Maybe when this package description says "symbolic" it means > "graphically simple"? Feel free to propose another wording for the package description. > I hope end users aren't going to be expected to learn this unfortunate > new piece of developerese. Of course not. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `-
<<attachment: audio-volume-medium-symbolic.png>>
<<attachment: audio-volume-medium.png>>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
