Jonathan Nieder wrote: > found 648939 linux-2.6/2.6.33-1~experimental.5 > quit > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > Here are two more data points (version numbers from /proc/version): > > > > Good 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-39) > > Bad 2.6.33-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.33-1~experimental.5) > > Ah, that's a much more manageable range. > > > Are those two close enough? > > I assume 2.6.33-1~experimental.3 reproduces it, too?
Yes, problem was reproduced in 2.6.33-1~experimental.3. No problem with 2.6.32-39. > If so, that's as much as we can learn from the pre-compiled packages, > yes. I'll try to find time tomorrow to look through the package list > and see if any of the changes in 2.6.33 jumps out at me. Great. Thanks. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
