Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> found 648939 linux-2.6/2.6.37-2
> quit
>
> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
> > Both 2.6.37-2-amd64 and 2.6.38-2-amd64 have the same problem.
>
> BTW, a more useful version number is that shown in parentheses by
> "cat /proc/version" (also shown by "dpkg-query -W
> linux-image-$(uname -r)"), since it changes more often than the
> package name.
Noted.
Here are two more data points (version numbers from /proc/version):
Good 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-39)
Bad 2.6.33-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.33-1~experimental.5)
Are those two close enough?
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
