Hi Luca,
Luca Capello wrote:
> Package: conkeror
> Version: 0.9.4-1
[...]
> xulrunner-10.0~a2 seems to have changed the format of the GRE version
> string, now also including the alpha number (this was not true for
> xulrunner-9.0~a2). This means that the check for xulrunner's version in
> /usr/bin/conkeror is broken and cannot be simply adapted to 10.0:
So this actually a bug in the code I still have to write: Support for
xulrunner 10. :-)
> Given that there is no unversioned xulrunner in Debian (see
> #648972),
This is still annoying me, but I agree with Mike that changes may
break the reverse dependencies.
> that upstream minimum requirement is xulrunner-1.9.1 [1] (xulrunner-1.9
> already in lenny)
xulrunner-1.9 is effectively version 1.9.0 and hence the Lenny version
of xulrunner is no more supported by recent conkeror versions.
> and that Ubuntu does not ship any /usr/bin/xulrunner* at all [2], I
> would avoid at all to check for the version number.
Hrm. You've got some point. I thought about this, too, but came to a
different conclusion. But after reading your arguments, I can't
remember anymore how I came to that conclusion. :-)
> And I would also avoid to repeat 'xulrunner-' for each version and
> simply use the version number in the for list.
Good idea!
> Here is a working-for-me patch against upstream /usr/bin/conkeror:
Thanks!
P.S.: I plan to upload a new package to unstable as soon as upstream
decides to declare a commit as 1.0 alpha to avoid the double tilde in
the 1.0~~pre version number currently used in the nightly .debs.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
