Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > > ist cabot still not ready for testing? > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > should we wait until someone adopts it?
Nobody stood up to go and support cabot. I guess someone should ask for removal from the archive: people seem to be happy with caff, as shipped with the signing-party package. Laurent Fousse has the final word on this, though. Bye, Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
