Hi, * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]: > Hello, > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > Hi, > > ist cabot still not ready for testing? > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or > should we wait until someone adopts it?
#289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot _upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something along the line of "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea. cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough for our users. Cheers, Laurent.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
