Hi together,

Cc'ing the appropriate Debian bug report, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645166

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 08:08:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I couldn't reproduce the problem at all on my links version. Then, I tried 
> to download links-2.3 package from Debian and the bug was there

So you could reproduce it. That's good, because from what was in the
bug report mentinoned above I couldn't reproduce it -- mostly because
it was neither clear if the cause were the typos in the bug report or if
they weren't copy and paste, nor what conditions have to be met.

SamK's answer's to these questions just came in a few minutes ago;
actually after your Cc to me and after I started this mail. :-)

> it can't connect to any ipv4 address specified numerically.

Thanks for that information, because that was the missing piece of
information that helped me to reproduce it!

SamK's details from today would have probably also helped. :-)

> It is actually Debian that broke this thing, specifically their 
> "ipv6.diff" patch.

Well, it's not "our" patch, it's the one floating around the net for
quite long and I decided to apply it because every networking
application in Debian should have IPv6 support.

> So it is up to them to fix it.

Yep, more precisely me. And I'll try to fix the patch instead of
removing it.

> I'm adding Debian Links maintainer "Axel Beckert" to CC.

Thanks for that!

                Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to