tags 645107 confirmed thanks Paul Wise wrote...
> iceweasel 7.0.1 claims that certificatepatrol is incompatible with it
> and refuses to let it run.
Indeed. But it does work at least on some installations (and actually
all of mine), so I didn't notice. This is confusing, but anyway:
Checking the install.rdf ...
<Description>
<em:id>{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}</em:id> <!-- Firefox,
Iceweasel, Flock -->
<em:minVersion>3.5</em:minVersion>
<em:maxVersion>7.0a1</em:maxVersion>
</Description>
... while the Mozilla plugins page lists 9.0a1, it seems upstream
mixed up a few things. I'll prepare a new upload.
> certificatepatrol should depend on the range of versions of iceweasel
> that it is compatible with so users never get a broken system, this
> recommends stuff is completely broken:
>
> Recommends: iceweasel (>= 3.5) | icedove (>= 3.0) | iceape (>= 2.0)
Please elaborate on that. Why do you call that broken? These are the
earliest versions certificatepatrol declares to be compatible with.
They are horribly outdated but users of wheezy or later will see newer
versions anyway.
The Recommends: line is substituted using '${xpi:Recommends}', so you
might want to turn to the mozilla-devscripts package.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
