Hello Christoph, Christoph Berg [2011-09-18 19:37 +0200]: > I think it is necessary, just because a logrotate version was > (un)available at build time doesn't mean that this will be the case at > run time. > > Actually, the problem exists both ways, so unless I forgot some > detail, p-common will probably need a Breaks: logrotate (<< 3.8) with > the hack (or a Depends) and a Breaks: logrotate (>= 3.8) without it.
Right, that'd be really correct. Done in bzr now. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
