Re: Martin Pitt 2011-09-18 <20110918111056.gf3...@piware.de> > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pitti/postgresql/common/revision/1099 > > Of course it's a bit of a hack, but works with all logrotate versions > and keeps backportability.
Cool idea. > > to logrotate, and hope that you will add a "Depends: logrotate (>= 3.8)" > > That will be unnecessary then. I think it is necessary, just because a logrotate version was (un)available at build time doesn't mean that this will be the case at run time. Actually, the problem exists both ways, so unless I forgot some detail, p-common will probably need a Breaks: logrotate (<< 3.8) with the hack (or a Depends) and a Breaks: logrotate (>= 3.8) without it. (Shouldn't be too hard to implement with substvars.) Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
