On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 03:20:34PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:54:16AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > > > Dunno what possible side effects that may imply however. > > > > It seems that the exim4 config may be suffering from this, as there may no > longer be suitable rules matching the domain in a discriminatory enough way > in exim directors config section. >
I tend to believe that using the same directives as the ones mentioned in mailman package's README.Exim4 wouldn't harm instead of a different solution, as it is supposed to : "play nice with mailman's virtual domains support and VERP. It does not require dedicating domain(s) to mailman." My 2 cents, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
