On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:16:59AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Olivier Berger wrote: > > > However, it should be possible to host the lists on the same fqdn as > > the web interface > > This is a Feature Request against the Upstream portion of the > software – I think these ought to be NOT filled in the Debian > BTS. (Technically, not a good idea, because the forge uses > things like groupname-trackername@domain for mails sent out > by PM and Tracker, which would collide with groupname-listname@ > in this scenario.) >
Ok, this implies that it's a constraint in upstream software to have a dedicated fqdn for those lists, but as shown in another post in this thread, the Debian packaging somehow allows to use the hostname for the lists, so... it may happen to be working more or less... I any case, if the domain for the lists and such notifications are identical, then the PHP part may handle eventual conflicts, so indeed there's probably a need for working this upstream for sure. Thanks for the followup. Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
