Alle mercoledì 3 agosto 2011, Sergei Golovan ha scritto:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Pino Toscano <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> > There's also a bit of duplication of this code defining MAXPATHLEN
> > (and all of them in different ways, even), see:
> > - lib/runtime_tools/c_src/trace_file_drv.c
> > - lib/erl_interface/src/prog/erl_start.c
> > - lib/erl_interface/src/misc/ei_internal.h
> > 
> > I guess there's the need for some uniformity...
> 
> True, but I don't think that we as maintainers should provide this
> uniformity.

True, but you can poke upstream ;)

> Though you may send your patch which uses MAXPATHLEN instead of
> PATH_MAX directly to the upstream.

Could you please forward it for me? I'd avoid to subscribe to another 
mailing list, just for a single porting patch...

Thanks!
-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to