Hi Pino!

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Pino Toscano <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> currently[1], erlang fails to build on hurd-i386.
>
> There are two problems:
> - apparently to the defined AF_LINK does correspond sockaddr_dl, so
>  undefine it

Seems ok to me.

> - some PATH_MAX usages, replaced with MAXPATHLEN (which is defined in
>  erlang itself, and already used almost everywhere)

And this part would require special reviewing after every new upstream
release (who knows where PATH_MAX will be used in new places). So, I
think that it'd be better to define PATH_MAX for Hurd instead of
replacing its instances by MAXPATHLEN.

Cheers!
-- 
Sergei Golovan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to