Hi,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:25:53AM -0700, Ricardo Yanez wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:49:26PM +0000, Ricardo Yanez wrote:
> >> Package: mirrors
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >>
> >> Submission-Type: new
> >> Site: debian.nod.cl
[..]
> >> Archive-upstream: ftp.br.debian.org
> >> Updates: push
> >
> > Ok. The thing is that we prefer to push all mirrors of a given round
> > robin from the same mirror (syncproxy.wna.debian.org), in order to
> > synchronize the moment mirrors apply the new content (2nd stage).
> 
> That makes perfect sense.

On that topic, could you update the virtual host so that it can serves any
*debian.org , maybe cdn.debian.net (though not managed by mirroradm).
The better option is obviously to get this as the default VH.
 
> >> Maintainer: Ricardo Yanez <ricardo.ya...@calel.org>
> >> Country: CL Chile
> >> Sponsor: NOD Networks Chile www.nod.cl
> >
> > How much bandwidth is available ?
> 
> The mirror is nominally in a 100 MB/s link, although how much of that is
> readily available to the server is hard to tell. I can say I have made
> tests from various computers around Chile and it downloads at speeds of
> 1-2 MB/s. It has a pretty good national bandwidth, comparable to
> debian.netlinux.cl.

Great, thanks.
 
> I will take a moment to thank you for allowing a Round-Robin. The fact
> is that a non-official mirror is usually in red, meaning it downloads
> more than it serves. debian.nod.cl is currently at 10:1. Debian users
> choose ftp.cl.d.o because it's Debian recommended, and the rest are
> basically ignored. A Round-Robin is perhaps the only way of fully
> utilizing the available bandwidth.

Or http redirect based on IP AS.

-- 
Simon Paillard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to