Hi Simon, > Hi Ricardo, > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:49:26PM +0000, Ricardo Yanez wrote: >> Package: mirrors >> Severity: wishlist >> >> Submission-Type: new >> Site: debian.nod.cl >> Type: leaf >> Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm armel hurd-i386 i386 ia64 >> kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc >> Archive-ftp: /debian/ >> Archive-http: /debian/ >> Archive-rsync: debian/ >> IPv6: no >> Archive-upstream: ftp.br.debian.org >> Updates: push > > Ok. The thing is that we prefer to push all mirrors of a given round > robin from > the same mirror (syncproxy.wna.debian.org), in order to synchronize the > moment > mirrors apply the new content (2nd stage). >
That makes perfect sense. >> Maintainer: Ricardo Yanez <ricardo.ya...@calel.org> >> Country: CL Chile >> Sponsor: NOD Networks Chile www.nod.cl > > How much bandwidth is available ? > The mirror is nominally in a 100 MB/s link, although how much of that is readily available to the server is hard to tell. I can say I have made tests from various computers around Chile and it downloads at speeds of 1-2 MB/s. It has a pretty good national bandwidth, comparable to debian.netlinux.cl. I will take a moment to thank you for allowing a Round-Robin. The fact is that a non-official mirror is usually in red, meaning it downloads more than it serves. debian.nod.cl is currently at 10:1. Debian users choose ftp.cl.d.o because it's Debian recommended, and the rest are basically ignored. A Round-Robin is perhaps the only way of fully utilizing the available bandwidth. Ricardo > -- > Simon Paillard > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
